Casebook (2024)

Situation 1

The puck is shot from behind the center red line and lands on top of the goal of the opposing team. Should icing be called?

Yes. Rule Reference 624(a).

Even though the puck comes to rest on top of the goal, it has completely crossed the goal line and therefore icing must be called.

Situation 2

The puck is shot over the opposing team’s goal line by a player who has both skates behind the center red line. However, the puck does not leave the stick until the blade has crossed the center red line. Should icing be called?

No. Rule References 624 Note and (a).

It is the position of the puck the moment the puck leaves the stick that determines whether or not there is a potential icing infraction.

Situation 3

For icing purposes, how high does the goal line extend?

Indefinitely. Rule Reference 624(a).

The goal lines extend horizontally across the entire width of the playing area and also vertically extending indefinitely.

Situation 4

A player in his Defending Zone shoots or passes the puck to a teammate still on his defending side of the center red line. The puck deflects off this player’s stick and goes the remaining length of the ice in the air, leaving the rink above the opposing goal. Is the Official correct in declaring this to be a “puck out of bounds” situation, with the face-off being held at the spot of the deflection nearest neutral zone spot to where the puck was deflected.

No. Rule Reference 624(a).

The fact that the player deflected the puck out of the rink has no bearing other than the fact that it was done before the center line. Under these conditions, the Official must rule the play as “icing” and conduct the face-off at the spot adjacent to the goal of the team that originally passed/shot the puck.

If the puck were deflected beyond the center red line or by an opponent, the Official would be correct in ruling this out of bounds (no icing) and then facing-off the puck at the nearest spot in the same zone ofthe deflection, as defined in Rule 612(b).

Situation 5

The puck is shot by a player from his defending half of the Neutral Zone and hits a teammate (body or stick), who is completely behind the center red line. The puck continues down the ice and crosses the goal line of the opposing team. Should icing be called?

Yes. Rule Reference 624(a).

The deflection is in the defending player’s half of the ice, so the icing infraction must be called.

Situation 6

The puck is shot by a player from his defending half of the Neutral Zone and hits a teammate, who is also in the Neutral Zone but completely over the center red line. The puck continues down the ice and crosses the goal line of the opposing team. Should icing be called?

No. Rule Reference 624(a).

In this situation the deflection occurred beyond the center red line, so the icing infraction is nullified.

Situation 7

The puck is passed from behind the center red line and deflects off a teammate’s stick. It continues down the ice, crossing the goal line of the opposing team. The player deflecting the puck has both skates on or behind the center red line, but his stick is over the center red line. Should icing be called?

No. Rule Reference 624(a).

It is the position of the puck at the moment it is deflected that determines whether or not an icing infraction has occurred.

Situation 8

At which end face-off spot does the face-off take place following an icing?

The face-off takes place at the end face-off spot on the side of the ice from which the puck was shot or passed. Rule Reference 624(a).

On which side of the ice the puck crosses the goal line is not a factor in determining face-off location.

Situation 9

A player shoots the puck into his opponent’s Defending Zone. The puck leaves the stick directly on the center red line. Is this a potential icing?

No. Rule References 624(Note & a).

Practical application of this rule suggests that the determining edge of the center red line for icing purposes would be the edge closest to the defending zone of the team shooting the puck.

Situation 10

Immediately after icing has been called on Team A by the Linesman, a Team A player cross-checks an opponent and receives a minor penalty. Where shall the ensuing face-off occur?

At a face-off spot in Team A’s Defending Zone. Rule Reference 624(a) and Note.

Conversely, had Team B committed a penalty infraction, the face-off would take place at a Neutral Zone face-off spot nearest to Team A’s Defending Zone.

Situation 11

The puck is shot from behind the center red line and enters the goal of the opposing team. Should icing be called?

No. Rule Reference 624(a).

A goal must be awarded in this instance.

Situation 12

The puck is shot from behind the center red line, continues down the ice and comes to a stop on the goal line. Shall icing be called?

No. Rule Reference 624(a).

The width of the goal line is considered to be a part of the line. In order for icing to be called, the entire puck must completely cross the edge closer to the end boards.

Situation 13

On an icing the puck situation, the puck, after being shot from behind the center red line, hits the cross bar of the goal and deflects in front of the goal. Is this considered to be icing?

No. Rule Reference 624(a).

The entire puck must completely cross the goal line in order for icing to be called.

Situation 14

The puck is shot by an attacking player and rebounds off a defending player in his defending half of the ice. The puck travels down the ice and crosses the goal line of the attacking player who shot the puck. Should icing be called?

No. Rule Reference 624(a).

Any time the puck is shot by an attacking player and rebounds from the body or stick of an opponent in his own half of the ice, so as to cross the goal line of the player shooting it, icing shall not be called.

Situation 15

The puck is dropped on a face-off and both sticks make initial contact with the puck, but the puck remains near the face-off spot. The center, in whose defending half of the ice the face-off occurred, gains possession an instant later and shoots the puck the length of the ice. Is this an icing infraction?

Yes. Rule References 624(a & b.3).

In order for the icing to be nullified because the puck was shot by a player directly from a face-off, the puck must receive its impetus from the initial stick contact on the face-off.

Situation 16

A player shoots the puck in the air from behind the center red line. An opposing player attempts to play the puck in the air but is unable to because of the speed of the puck. Should icing still be in effect?

Yes. Rule References 624(a & b.5).

A player who is making an attempt to play the puck cannot be expected to play it in the air. The determining factors as to whether or not icing will be called are the proximity of the puck to the player, the speed at which it is traveling, and whether or not the defending player had a reasonable opportunity to play the puck.

Situation 17

The puck, shot from behind the center red line, bounces over the stick of an opposing player who attempts to play the puck or rebounds off the boards and over his stick. Is icing still in effect?

Yes. Rule References 624(a & b.5).

The Official must make his decision based upon the proximity of the puck to the player, the speed of the puck, and whether or not the defending player had a reasonable opportunity to play the puck.

Situation 18

With one second remaining in a penalty to Team A, a Team A player ices the puck. By the time the puck crosses the goal line, Team A is back at full strength. Is this an icing situation (for Adults [male and female] and High School classifications only)?

No. Rule Reference 624(b.1).

In those classifications that allow for a shorthanded team to legally ice the puck, icing is determined the instant the puck is shot and leaves the stick blade of the shooter and not at the instant the puck completely crosses the goal line.

Situation 19

The puck is shot from behind the center red line and continues toward the opposing team’s goal line. An opposing player starts moving toward the puck but then turns away before the puck crosses the goal line. Is icing still in effect?

No. Rule Reference 624(b.5).

The opposing team must make every effort to play the puck before it crosses the goal line. Should the Official feel as though the opposing team, other than the goalkeeper, was able to play the puck, icing shall be nullified.

Situation 20

The puck is shot from behind the center red line. An opposing player has a reasonable opportunity to play the puck, but instead turns to physically engage withthe attacking player. Is icing still in effect?

No. Rule Reference 624(b.5).

The icing must be nullified the moment the player chooses to not attempt to play the puck.

Situation 21

The puck is shot from behind the center red line and continues toward the goal line. The goalkeeper moves out a few feet to play the puck, but refrains from doing so, and the puck crosses the goal line. Is icing still in effect?

Yes. Rule Reference 624(b.5).

The goalkeeper is not required to play the puck during an icing situation.

Situation 22

The puck is shot from the defending half of the ice, thereby creating a potential icing situation. An opposing player has a reasonable chance to play the puck. They choose, however, to coast toward the puck as it nears the goal line. Is icing still in effect?

No. Rule Reference 624(b.5).

The defending player must make a reasonable effort to play the puck.

Situation 23

An icing situation is created as the puck is shot past the defending team’s players’ bench. The defending team, in the process of making a line change, elects to let the puck continue down the ice in fear of being called for “too many players on the ice” if it is played. Is icing still in effect?

No. Rule Reference 624(b.5).

Icing must be nullified if one player of that team had a reasonable chance to play the puck, but chose not to.

Situation 24

Play is stopped in error for an icing infraction. Where is the face-off?

At the nearest end zone face-off spot with respect to the location of the puck when it crossed the goal line. Rule Reference 624(c).

The puck should have been “live” behind the goal line, thus the face-off now takes place in that zone.

Alright, buckle up, because we're about to dive deep into the world of hockey rules, specifically those governing icing situations. You're in for a treat if you love the nitty-gritty details of the game.

First off, let's talk about the situations you provided. The scenarios cover a range of icing possibilities, and it's clear that the rules are meticulously defined to handle each case. The key reference here is Rule 624(a), which emphasizes the importance of the puck completely crossing the goal line for icing to be called.

Now, let's break down the concepts:

  1. Situation 1: Puck shot from center red line, lands on top of the opposing goal. Icing is called because the puck crossed the goal line.

  2. Situation 2: Puck shot over the goal line from behind center red line, but not released until blade crosses the line. No icing, as it's the position of the puck when it leaves the stick that matters.

  3. Situation 3: Goal line extends horizontally and vertically indefinitely for icing purposes.

  4. Situation 4: Puck deflected out of rink before center line, ruled as icing. If deflected beyond the center red line or by an opponent, it's considered out of bounds.

  5. Situation 5: Puck shot from defending half of Neutral Zone, hits teammate behind center red line, and crosses goal line. Icing is called.

  6. Situation 6: Same as Situation 5, but deflection occurred beyond the center red line, so no icing.

  7. Situation 7: Puck passed from behind center red line, deflected off a teammate's stick. No icing, as it's the position of the puck at the moment of deflection that matters.

  8. Situation 8: Face-off after icing at the end face-off spot on the side from which the puck was shot or passed.

  9. Situation 9: Puck shot into opponent's Defending Zone from center red line. Not potential icing. Edge closest to the defending zone determines.

  10. Situation 10: Icing called on Team A, followed by a minor penalty. Face-off in Team A's Defending Zone.

  11. Situation 11: Puck shot from behind center red line enters the goal. No icing; a goal is awarded.

  12. Situation 12: Puck shot from behind center red line comes to a stop on the goal line. No icing; entire puck must cross the edge closer to the end boards.

  13. Situation 13: Puck hits crossbar, deflects in front of the goal. Not icing; entire puck must completely cross the goal line.

  14. Situation 14: Puck shot, rebounds off defending player in his own half, and crosses goal line. No icing.

  15. Situation 15: Face-off situation, puck shot down the ice. Icing infraction because puck must receive its impetus from the initial stick contact on the face-off.

  16. Situation 16: Puck shot in the air, opposing player unable to play it. Icing still in effect because proximity, speed, and opportunity matter.

  17. Situation 17: Puck bounces over opposing player's stick attempting to play. Icing is still in effect, considering proximity, speed, and opportunity.

  18. Situation 18: Shorthanded Team A ices the puck. Icing determined when the puck is shot and leaves the stick, not when it crosses the goal line.

  19. Situation 19: Opposing player turns away before puck crosses goal line. No icing; opposing team must make every effort to play the puck.

  20. Situation 20: Opposing player turns away instead of attempting to play the puck. Icing nullified; the moment player chooses not to attempt, icing is nullified.

  21. Situation 21: Goalkeeper moves to play the puck, refrains, and it crosses the goal line. Icing is still in effect; goalkeeper not required to play the puck.

  22. Situation 22: Defending player has a reasonable chance but chooses not to play the puck. Icing is nullified if a reasonable effort is made.

  23. Situation 23: Icing nullified if one player had a reasonable chance to play the puck but chose not to, even during a line change.

  24. Situation 24: Play stopped in error for icing. Face-off at the nearest end zone face-off spot where the puck crossed the goal line.

That's a comprehensive breakdown of the scenarios you provided. It's evident that the rules are designed with precision, taking into account various factors to ensure fair and accurate judgments in icing situations.

Casebook (2024)

FAQs

What is the purpose of a casebook? ›

A casebook is a type of textbook used primarily by students in law schools. Rather than simply laying out the legal doctrine in a particular area of study, a casebook contains excerpts from legal cases in which the law of that area was applied.

How do you read a law school casebook? ›

I recommend that one begin by focusing on the overall structure of the case; one should try to understand the overall picture of: (1) what has happened that has provoked someone to take this case to court; (2) what happened at the trial court that has provoked someone to appeal; (3) what did the higher court do with ...

Is casebook Hipaa compliant? ›

About Casebook

You can manage cases, clients, and services from any device on a HIPAA compliant platform.

How fast do law students read? ›

By the end of the first semester, most students read ten pages an hour and keep at that pace until the end of their second year. However, with the right techniques, you can start at ten pages an hour and leap to twenty or thirty pages within your first semester.

How do law students memorize cases? ›

Auditory learners can practice the material by reading the material or answering practice questions aloud. Kinesthetic learners often learn best and memorize the most by handwriting their notes and using flashcards. Work hard but do it consistently and with purpose. Best of luck in your first year!

Do you have to read every case in law school? ›

You'll be reading casebooks instead of traditional textbooks. They're collections of legal cases and decisions. You'll probably be expected to read several cases in preparation for each class. You can't skip the reading.

What is a casebook in writing? ›

: a book containing records of illustrative cases that is used for reference and instruction (as in law or medicine) 2.

Why do lawyers do case briefs? ›

Case briefing aids your memory. Briefs help you remember the cases you read (1) for class discussion, (2) for end-of-semester review for final examinations, and (3) for writing and analyzing legal problems.

What is a casebook in consulting? ›

What are Consulting Casebooks? Consulting casebooks are documents that MBA consulting clubs put together to help their members prepare for consulting case interviews. Consulting casebooks provide some case interview strategies and tips, but they mostly contain case interview practice cases.

Are case briefs mandatory? ›

The judge must determine at the conference whether to require each party to submit a trial or hearing brief. If trial briefs will be required, they must comply with the requirements of rule 5.394. Any additional requirements to the brief must be provided to the parties in writing before the end of the conference.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 6080

Rating: 5 / 5 (50 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Birthday: 2000-07-07

Address: 5050 Breitenberg Knoll, New Robert, MI 45409

Phone: +2556892639372

Job: Investor Mining Engineer

Hobby: Sketching, Cosplaying, Glassblowing, Genealogy, Crocheting, Archery, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is The Hon. Margery Christiansen, I am a bright, adorable, precious, inexpensive, gorgeous, comfortable, happy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.